![]() ![]() “I want to assure you that I take them seriously and they will be addressed.” (Hauser, for his part, neither confirmed nor denied wrongdoing Sanna has not commented on his alleged misconduct.) The obvious irony of Gino’s situation makes for a punchy headline-“Dishonesty Researcher Accused of Dishonesty”-but it also speaks to a vexing paradox of human behavior, one that Gino has herself returned to again and again in her academic work. “As I continue to evaluate these allegations and assess my options, I am limited into what I can say publicly,” it says. When I emailed Gino for comment, she referred me to a recent LinkedIn post. Her accusers now suggest that Gino, who has been placed on administrative leave from Harvard, may have faked data in dozens of her other published papers. Diederik Stapel, a Dutch social psychologist whose work touched on such topics as selfishness and morality, fabricated data at least 50 times, making him “ perhaps the biggest con man in academic science.” And last month, Francesca Gino, a Harvard Business School professor who studies dishonesty-and who wrote a book titled Rebel Talent: Why It Pays to Break the Rules at Work and in Life-was accused of falsifying data in at least four papers, three of which are on their way to being retracted. The University of Michigan psychologist Lawrence Sanna, who studied judgment and decision making, resigned after facing similar allegations. ![]() ![]() ![]() The former Harvard psychologist Marc Hauser, author of Moral Minds: The Nature of Right and Wrong, was found to have fabricated data and manipulated results. When behavioral-science researchers are accused of misbehavior, the allegations have a funny way of being a little on the nose. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |